Live com Miguel do Rosário (convidado especial: Luiz Moreira)

The Hindu: The curious saga of Lula da Silva that has undermined democracy in Brazil

Por Miguel do Rosário

28 de abril de 2018 : 09h19

On The Hindu

A crisis that’s been long in the making
By Vijay Prashad
APRIL 10, 2018 00:02 IST
UPDATED: APRIL 09, 2018 23:13 IST

The curious saga of Lula da Silva that has undermined democracy in Brazil

Over the weekend, Brazil’s former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva turned himself in to the police after having been charged with corruption under the wide-ranging Lava Jato (Car Wash) investigation. Tens of thousands of people blocked roads across the country to protest his impending arrest. Thousands surrounded the metalworkers’ union building where he had waited. When he insisted that he would turn himself in and begin serving his 12-year sentence, Mr. Lula da Silva was carried on the shoulders of the crowd waiting outside. It was a dramatic moment for a man who remains hugely popular in Brazil and is seen by many as a standard-bearer of the aspirations of the poor.

Before he went to prison, Mr. Lula da Silva released a statement of great feeling: “Those who persecute me can do what they want to me, but they will never imprison our dreams.” Brazil is to hold a presidential election in October. Mr. Lula da Silva, who left office in 2011 with high approval ratings, had been chosen by the Workers’ Party (PT) as its candidate. By all indications, he would have swept to victory. He had promised to reinvigorate the pro-poor policies that had been a hallmark of his presidency which began in 2003. Those policies such as Fome Zero (Zero Hunger) had decreased hunger in the country and increased opportunities for children of poor families to go to school and college. One woman carried a sign that read, “Lula condemned for putting the daughter of a domestic worker through university.”

A fragile democracy

Brazil’s democracy is fragile. It was the trade union movement with which Mr. Lula da Silva remains affiliated and other such organised platforms that overthrew a U.S.-backed military dictatorship that had lasted from 1964 to 1985. Over the next 15 years, the civilian government did not uproot the institutions of the dictatorship nor weaken the oligarchy that had benefited from military rule. This power bloc remained firmly in control even during the PT-led governments of Mr. Lula da Silva (2003-2011) and Dilma Rousseff (2011-2016). During this period of high commodity prices, social welfare policies could be enacted but little else was possible. The oligarchy, impatient to retain control of Brazil, did everything possible to undermine any democratic dynamic.

In 2016, Ms. Rousseff was removed from office not by an election but by the shenanigans of political horse-trading in parliament. At that time, it was said that the oligarchy had conducted a ‘soft coup’ against the PT government. Her successor, Michel Temer, has not been elected to his post by the people but was installed there by the National Congress. Most Brazilians view him as a ‘bad’ or ‘terrible’ president. Under Mr. Temer, the government withdrew many of the PT’s social welfare policies. In 2014, Brazil was removed from the UN’s Hunger Map but is likely to return on it.

Over the past year, Mr. Lula da Silva’s Caravan for Brazil has moved from one poor community to another, where he has been defending the PT’s policies and attacking the oligarchy. Mass movements such as Brazil’s Landless Workers’ Movement have backed him totally, even though they had fought his timidity while in office. That he was a symbol for the poor was clear to the mass movements and the oligarchy.

Car Wash and other such investigations were made possible by strong laws against corruption put in place by Mr. Lula da Silva’s government. In fact, few political figures have been immune from charges of corruption. In Brazil, trust in government is very low. It is advantageous to the oligarchy to see the influence of the government diminish. Now, threats to its immense power are not so sharp.

Mr. Lula da Silva has been accused of accepting an apartment from a contractor (OAS) in exchange for government contracts, a charge he has denied. Evidence for the bribe is weak to non-existent, and there is no paperwork to show that he received an apartment or owns it. A convicted executive of OAS whose prison sentence was reduced for his statement against the leader, gave evidence against Mr. Lula da Silva. The presiding judge in the trial, who has demonstrated on wiretaps his partisanship against Mr. Lula da Silva, accepted the statement and convicted him. Appeals were denied and considerations of habeas corpus rejected.

Democratic test

A series of consequential elections are to take place this year in Latin America: Venezuela (May), Mexico (July) and Brazil (October). In Mexico, socialist candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador is the frontrunner. It is almost certain that he won on his first attempt in 2006 but was denied his victory by the ruling establishment. In Venezuela, the right-wing opposition is in disarray, which is likely to allow the Bolivarian movement to retain its hold on government. Each of these contests from Venezuela onwards will have an impact on the Left in the hemisphere. In each of these countries, if the elections were fair, the Left would win. But ‘democracy’ has been increasingly desiccated by institutional manoeuvres, such as the attack on Mr. Lula da Silva.

There is a widespread sense that Mr. Lula’ da Silva’s prosecution, like the removal of Ms. Rousseff, is politically motivated. It would have been virtually impossible for Jair Bolsonaro, the candidate of the Right to defeat anyone backed by the PT.

If the courts now refuse to allow Mr. Lula da Silva to run in the October election as is expected, it will call into question the legitimacy of that vote. Democracy is in crisis in Brazil.

Vijay Prashad is the Director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, one of whose offices is in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Miguel do Rosário

Miguel do Rosário é jornalista e editor do blog O Cafezinho. Nasceu em 1975, no Rio de Janeiro, onde vive e trabalha até hoje.

Apoie O Cafezinho


Ajude o Cafezinho a continuar forte e independente, faça uma assinatura! Você pode contribuir mensalmente ou fazer uma doação de qualquer valor.

Veja como nos apoiar »

5 comentários

Os comentários aqui postados são de responsabilidade exclusiva de seus autores e não representam a opinião do site O CAFEZINHO. Todos as mensagens são moderadas. Não serão aceitos comentários com ofensas, com links externos ao site, e em letras maiúsculas. Em casos de ofensas pessoais, preconceituosas, ou que incitem o ódio e a violência, denuncie.

Escrever comentário »

GREEN plex

29 de abril de 2018 às 00h03

não se envergonhe do choro da dignidade,LULA LIVRE por JUSTIÇA ausente no poder bandido que incrimina ser MELHOR PRESIDENTE.



28 de abril de 2018 às 22h26

Obrigado Miguel
Obrigado Vijay Prashad.



28 de abril de 2018 às 22h09

Artigo muito interessante, mas acho engraçado essa história de “democracia em crise”. Parece que todo mundo tem medo de enxergar o óbvio: não há democracia nenhuma: o governo não foi eleito!! Apesar do Vampirão ter sido vice da Dilma, ele escreveu seu programa de governo (a tal da ponte pro inferno) depois da eleição, em 2015!! (não quero ser chato, mas até hoje não engulo a presença do Requião naquele vídeo do PMDB da “ponte pro futuro”, pois ali (pós-2013) as aspirações golpistas já estavam mais do que claras! Mas tudo bem, pelo menos ele mudou de lado já na época do “impeachment”, outros tontos ainda teimam com o blablabla da democracia e das instituições funcionando).
Reconheço que a palavra “democracia” é muito bonita, tanto que estava estampada nos jornais em 2 de abril de 1964 e o secretário de Estado dos EUA a utilizou após a derrubada do único presidente eleito no Egito. Mas insistir em chamar o Brasil de democracia é simplesmente ridículo. Aliás, se fizerem uma pesquisa de aprovação, verão que Al Sisi ou Kim Yong -Un tem mais do que os 3% do Vampirão.



28 de abril de 2018 às 14h39

Parabéns, Miguel. Precisamos mesmo ver mais artigos sobre a repercussão internacional do presidente Lula nos blogs progressistas.


Fernando Carneiro

28 de abril de 2018 às 11h32

Good article but democracy is not in crisis in Brazil, democracy is gone since state coup against Dilma Roussef government in 2016.


Deixe uma resposta